I will be grateful to see eHarmony answering within formal weblog to a write-up titled “Marriage-Maker Claims tend to be Tied in Knots ” from Wall Street log. The WSJ post examines many relationship stats introduced by internet dating sites like eHarmony also the strategy used to estimate these data. We talked some concerning this subject too, a few weeks ago as soon as the original WSJ article was printed (see Story).

The WSJ post didn’t turn to kindly on the statistics released by online dating sites, and also for the the majority of part I buy into the author. Anyone needs to understand just how these data are generated. Of the many online dating sites discussed in the WSJ article, “eHarmony stands out as among the list of a lot more cautious people”. It is not just a glowing document for eHarmony thus, they chose to upload a reply on their blog.

In eHarmony blog post they’re going into additional details on how they calculated that their unique dating website ended up being accountable for 2percent of marriages in the usa, from the 12-month period finishing March 2007. The vast majority of info we currently realized about from a previously circulated PDF document called “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics few eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), nevertheless post does clean out a few more details. What this blog article does show is, eHarmony is wanting getting as available and clear and their analysis conclusions as you possibly can. I think title “Open Communication” may undoubtedly end up being the ideal choice the recognized eHarmony blog site.

Here is the full eHarmony response to the Wall Street diary about how exactly they determine their unique wedding research. For further information on this dating internet site, browse the post on eHarmony.